Oh, Susquehanna!

butitlookslikefun:

iheartlungs:

healthylivingforyou:

carmaymay:

There is a chemical in a girls’ brain is released only two different times in her life, when she has sex, and when she breast feeds her baby. This chemical emotionally connects her to another person for the rest of her life. Us guys? We only release this chemical when we bond with our children. So if you think sex is a game and go around fucking as many girls as you want, remember that you can mentally mess this girl up for the rest of her life. If you’re still friends afterwards then whatever, but she will always feel some sort of feeling for you, just because of the chemical.

It’s called Oxytocin, it’s actually released when a woman gives birth as well. But this is so true… sex is more than just a game, and this is a clear reason that explains why humans were only created to have sex with just one person. Doing it with multiple people will have a very strong negative effect on your relationship with the person you want to be with for the rest of your life. I wish more kids knew about this… not that this should be your only motive not to have sex before marriage, but it is one of the most important.

Everyone should know this.

Fact. Biochemistry is so amazing. If only more guys had sex for the sole purpose of love… Then they would see how wonderful love truly is. Shoot, why can’t men evolve to feel that way, too?! Men don’t need to spread their seed as much as possible any more, we’re already having population problems in some parts of the world, haha.

shit. makes sense..

You lost my attention at “not that this should be your only motive not to have sex before marriage, but it is one of the most important.” Which is a pity, because I actually had to read that whole thing to get to that one REALLY bad sentence after all those vaguely awful ones. Where the hell is the source for this “men can really mess girls up” business. Why is it assumed that men are the ones that have sex for pleasure? It’s alright to fuck if you want to fuck. And that doesn’t mean you’re compromising anything about yourself, and that doesn’t mean you’re going to be irrationally bound to the person you had sex with for all time. Yes, people want to be loved. Yes, love feels good. But there’s nothing wrong with pleasure for the sake of pleasure. If I’m single and I want to have sex with someone I have no intention of marrying, then I will, and I promise I’ll be fine. If I’m in a relationship and I want to have sex with my partner because we’re fond of each other, or because we love each other and we want to get physical about it, we’ll do it. But sex isn’t what love is. 

Here’s a source: “…Sex may foster closeness, researchers say, but oxytocin shouldn’t be blamed for bonding you forever to that guy you met at the bar last night. And the hormone isn’t exactly going to make you a top salesman or irresistible lover. In fact, oxytocin is a complex chemical with a variety of influences on social behavior. It can increase trust among strangers — but it can also intensify negative memories of an aloof mother and even make you favor your “in-group” over people you perceive as outsiders.

“Oxytocin is not this indiscriminate love drug,” Carsten K.W. de Dreu, a psychologist at the University of Amsterdam, told LiveScience.” (source)

And this: “If only more guys had sex for the sole purpose of love… Then they would see how wonderful love truly is. Shoot, why can’t men evolve to feel that way, too?!” 

You just took evolution and ran with it, huh? How about you give men the benefit of the doubt and assume they understand that love is pretty alright. How about you give people the benefit of the doubt and assume they’ll figure out how to be okay with the choices they make in their own lives. By all means - be as responsible as you know how to be about the choices you make, but don’t trivialize human experience with this drivel.

Oh, and please stop making science look stupid. 

Dang, Beck. Well said.

(Source: moonbeamglowspace)